Hindus as cannon fodder in Christian-Muslim conflict

JEHADI Islam, humiliated by the West, repulsed by Islamic states, has now turned against the hands that had placed it under leash. Jehadi Islam has turned violently against White Christianity and White Christian nations. It has also turned against those Muslims and those Islamic states that it perceives as being close allies of the White western nations in trade, in international politics and in the war against terror. It is in this context that one must place the sudden and open interference on Kashmir by the Saudi monarch, OIC, bin Laden and India’s Muslim religious leaders. Islam’s religion and Islam’s polity are now competing against each other to achieve Islam’s politico-religious objectives.

The Saudi King wears two hats. He is the custodian of Islam’s two holiest and most important shrines; as such he has a tremendous religious responsibility towards the Muslim ummah. He is also the titular head of state of the country that is home to Islam’s holiest shrines; and as such he also has political responsibilities towards all the faithful. And he, probably more than any other Muslim head of state, knows the consequences of Islam’s religion and polity turning against each other. Islamic polity cannot alienate or lose its most deadly weapon�jehad, or its most fanatic religious adherents�the jehadis, without being enfeebled vis-a-vis its most bitter enemies�the Christians and the Jews.

The Saudi King has now undertaken to not only consolidate the Muslim world against the West, whose ally he was until recently, but he is also slowly but surely distancing himself personally and his country from the US and other western nations. This he has to do not only to reclaim for Islam its lost dignity but also to mitigate the anger of the jehadis against Muslim rulers and Muslim states and ultimately return jehad to its pride of place as Islam’s most deadly weapon against White Christianity, Jews and other kafirs, primarily the Hindus of India.

India, with its insane commitment to a perverted idea of ‘secularism’, is the softest target for not only the politics of White Christianity but also jehadi Islam.

India, with its insane commitment to a perverted idea of ‘secularism’ is the softest target for not only the politics of White Christianity but also jehadi Islam. And that is why Hindus in government can easily be browbeaten by the concepts of human rights, pluralism, freedom of religion and minority rights. Hindus in government can also be browbeaten by the threat of violence held out by Indian Muslims whenever the Muslims wish to demonstrate the power of minorityism. Hindu India is incapable of dealing ruthlessly with both religious conversion, which is White Christianity’s poisoned spear disguised in modernity, and the naked spear of jehadi Islam, which never cared to disguise itself.

A cursory look at the Islamic world and White Christianity’s response to it endorse this scenario. Iran continues to defy the UNSC, the IAEA, American and western strong-arm tactics and so-called international calls to halt its military nuclear programme. Iran is neither big enough nor militarily powerful enough today to resist all these pressures. We can safely conclude that it is being covertly but solidly backed by the entire Islamic world, specifically Saudi Arabia. The US will have to be very foolish to embark on adventurism in Iran, as it did in Iraq. The Islamic world is wide awake now; besides, jehadi Islam is running amuck, out of control of both its former White Christian masters and its former ally, Islamic polity. If Saudi Arabia and Iran decide to flood world markets jointly with all their oil, oil prices would drop so sharply that the Islamic world may absorb the loss of revenue albeit with great difficulty but the US economy would be ruined beyond even long-term repair. Russia knows this well enough and so does China.

The Saudi monarch, in his efforts to assert his leadership over the world’s faithful, made an extraordinary state visit to India. This was not only to look for alternate (to the US) buyers of Saudi oil, but also to send signals to the Indian Muslim community that he will henceforth give open voice to their demands. He may thus have signalled to the Muslims to engage in political participation to articulate and fulfill their demands. The Saudi monarch is thus seizing the initiative from the jehadis, an initiative the jehadis are unwilling to trust or concede. The jehadi attacks against the Hindus of Varanasi and Doda may be seen in this light. The monarch also made a state visit to Pakistan. All jehadis have a direct or indirect connection with terrorist groups in Pakistan and the ISI, which truth may be ascertained from the fact that all acts of jehadi terror have a direct or indirect Pakistani connection. If jehadi Islam has to return to the control of Islamic polity, then control of Pakistan becomes essential.

There are two distinct streams of jehadi terror operating from within Pakistan�one directed against Israel and the West and the other directed against India. The Al Qaeda and bin Laden had hitherto focussed their terror operations only against the US and the West and Israel; while the ISI-partnered JeM, LeT and HUM targeted India. But now just as the western world is consolidating itself against Islam and just as Islamic polity is consolidating itself under the Saudi monarch, jehadi Islam is also consolidating its operations to target its historic enemies�the White Christians, the Jews and the kafir Hindus.

The Saudi monarch has to control Pakistan if he has to ultimately regain control of the jehadis. In the immediate, Pakistan can be controlled only by pleasing Musharraf; which is why the Saudi King is giving voice to Pakistan’s obsession to wrest Kashmir for Islam. The Saudi monarch has to win Kashmir for Islam not only to send the signal to jehadi Islam that Islamic polity is committed to Dar-ul-Islam but also to please Musharraf for whom Kashmir is a personal agenda. And Musharraf has to be kept in good spirits and in power in Pakistan if he has to be controlled by Islamic polity and not the jehadis. The Saudi monarch’s long-term plan for Pakistan will be to give Islamic polity in Pakistan the upper hand over jehadi Islam. And so, the first sop will be for Islamic polity to achieve for Islam merely with the threat of possible violence against the Hindus of India, what jehadi Islam is attempting to do with actual acts of terror.

All jehadis have a direct or indirect connection to terrorist groups in Pakistan and the ISI, which truth may be ascertained from the fact that all acts of jehadi terror have a direct or indirect Pakistani connection. If jehadi Islam has to return to the control of Islamic polity, then control of Pakistan becomes essential.

White Christians, capitalist states and born-again communist regimes must accept that they cannot wipe one another off the face of this earth as long as one of them continues to live. Similarly, White Christianity and Islam must accept that neither of the two politico-religious way of life can wipe the other off the face of the earth as long as both of them insist that they have to render all world unto Christ and transform all world into a Dar-ul-Islam. As long as their religion, politics and economics remain monotheistic, there is going to be destruction and terrorism. More than Christians and Muslims, Hindus must understand the nature of these religions and their attendant polity. Hindus will be forced to deal with an aggressive Christian community, a violent Muslim community and the Marxist terror groups whose tentacles spread internally from outside our national borders.

It is not clear yet if Indian Muslim religious leaders are echoing the Saudi monarch or obediently following bin Laden’s instructions to step up pressure on Hindu India. But this intra-Islam confrontation between Islam’s polity and religious extremism and the ceaseless cosmic war between White Christianity, the Jews and Islam is turning Hindu India into cannon-fodder for these Abrahamic faiths; and Hindu India willingly offers itself for sacrifice. The two Muslim religious leaders who demanded of Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi that the Kashmir issue be resolved must tell us what ‘resolve’ means specifically and whether the solution entails conceding territory to Islam yet again internally as separatist autonomy or externally as separatist secession.

Indian Muslims must make the choice between being Indians first and Muslims. If they are Indians first, then they must live in a manner that does not offend Hindu sensibilities. They must start to make amends for historic wrongs by removing their offending presence from Hinduism’s three holy shrines in Ayodhya, Kashi and Mathura. Indian Muslims must also assume an unambiguous position with regard to India’s territory and not call for or support demands for concession of territory to Islam internally or externally. If Indian Muslims are not able to resolve their dilemma then they will have to swallow the bitter pill that Hindu India will do everything to protect its religion, its adherents and its territory. Intra-Islam instability and the cosmic war between the two major Abrahamic faiths must be told to resolve their differences outside of Hindu India’s territory. Hindus must create the vocabulary to speak in a language that our adversaries will understand.

Both Islamic polity and jehadi Islam know that Hindus are not too far from devising such a vocabulary. And that is why the Saudi monarch undertook a state visit to Hindu-majority India, something that no Saudi monarch had done since the 1950s and that is why jehadi Islam felt compelled to set off a dud bomb in the Jama Masjid. (Concluded)

http://www.organiser.org/dynamic/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=135&page=37