Hindu outfits protest over hosting of Iftar in Udupi Sri Krishna mutt premises

About 150 Muslims broke their Ramzan fast and took part in “Souharda Upahara Koota” (harmony feast) in the complex of Udupi Sri Krishna mutt on June 24.(Wikimedia commons)

Activists of three Hindu outfits on Sunday staged a protest in the twin districts of Dakshina Kannada and Udupi in protest against the hosting of an Iftar get-together and namaz at Udupi Sri Krishna mutt on June 24 by Pejawar seer Vishweshateertha Swamiji.

Workers of Sri Rama Sene, Hindu Janajagruthi Samiti and Hindu Mahasabha staged the protests in the districts.

Addressing the protesters at Lalbagh in Mangaluru, Hindu Mahasabha state convenor Dharmendra alleged that the seer’s action was being used by political parties and there was a conspiracy behind this at a time when state assembly elections are around the corner.

The Swamiji’s action had “deeply hurt” the sentiments of Hindus, who were always emotionally attached to the mutt, he said and asked him to step down as head of the mutt as age was catching up with him.

He should also tender an apology for holding the Iftar inside the temple complex, Dharmendra said.

The Hindu Mahasabha leader also wanted to know from the BJP why they were keeping a studied silence on the issue.

“Those who protested when Congress leader Janardhan Poojary held an Iftar at Kudroli temple here a few years back had now become mute spectators,” he said.

Sri Rama Sene district secretary Prasad Ujire, who also spoke, said the Iftar had created confusion among members of the Hindu community.

In Udupi, workers of Hindu outfits held the protest in the form a puja before a makeshift idol of Lord Krishna and singing of bhajans in front of the clock tower in the town.

Speaking at the venue, Sri Rama Sene Mangaluru unit secretary Mohan Bhat ridiculed the Youth Congress district leader’s statement that they would not allow Sene to protest against the seer and said none should read a political motive behind the protest. The Sene also had no intention to spark communal unrest, he said.

The Swamiji was a guru for the Hindu community and should have avoided hosting the Iftar in mutt premises, he said.

Hindu Janajagruti Samiti convenor Vijay Kumar also spoke.

Police had made tight security arrangements as a precautionary measure at the spots of the protests, which were peaceful in both the places.

On June 24, in a gesture of communal amity, about 150 Muslims broke their Ramzan fast and took part in “Souharda Upahara Koota” (harmony feast) in the complex of Krishna temple for the first time in its history.

They participated in the feast in the dining hall, just outside the main temple, in the event organised by Sri Vishweshateertha Swamiji. After breaking the fast, they performed ‘namaz’ (prayers).

The seer defended his gesture after it drew flak from Rama Sene, saying it had in no way insulted Hindus.

Sene chief Pramod Muthalik had met the seer on June 25 and announced statewide protests against him by his outfit on July 2.

On June 29, a man was booked for posting “unpleasant and objectionable” remarks on Facebook against the seer for hosting the “harmony feast”.

He was booked on a complaint by three persons who were the seer’s supporters and members of Pejawar blood donation team, police had said.

Source : Hindustan Times

Leave a Comment

Notice : The source URLs cited in the news/article might be only valid on the date the news/article was published. Most of them may become invalid from a day to a few months later. When a URL fails to work, you may go to the top level of the sources website and search for the news/article.

Disclaimer : The news/article published are collected from various sources and responsibility of news/article lies solely on the source itself. Hindu Janajagruti Samiti (HJS) or its website is not in anyway connected nor it is responsible for the news/article content presented here. ​Opinions expressed in this article are the authors personal opinions. Information, facts or opinions shared by the Author do not reflect the views of HJS and HJS is not responsible or liable for the same. The Author is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article. ​