Cong refuses to give word on Sethu project

New Delhi: The Congress party on Monday accused the Bharatiya Janata Party of hypocrisy on the Sethu Samudram shipping canal project but refused to say if it will complete it. Congress spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi said the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance was now opposing the project citing religious reasons after initially coming out all for it.

It was the NDA government that started the project in 1999, he told reporters. He added that it did not use the term Sethu Samudram then, referring to it as a canal project or Adam’s bridge. "The BJP and its allies were indulging in utter hypocrisy, double standards and double speak and misusing the name of Lord Ram for political gains," Singhvi said. The project, which seeks to cut shipping time between the east and west coasts of India, has run into serious opposition from Hindu nationalist groups and also the BJP who say it would destroy a bridge they claim was laid during the time of the Ramayana. Experts refute this theory.

Singhvi rattled off details about the project under the NDA government and quoted statements of NDA ministers to drive home his point. "Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee had himself grandly announced the project," he said.

"In January 1999, Defence Minister George Fernandes said that … the canal was a top priority of the government," Singhvi said. "Then Shipping Minister Satrughan Sinha called it a dream project.

"The NDA government held several meetings to give environmental clearance and remove other roadblocks." Asked if the Congress-led government would complete the project, he tried to evade the question. "Now the matter is pending in the Supreme Court and all the documents, technical details and photographs have been submitted to it. We will follow the court’s directives," he said.

Source: sify.com

Read Further

> Congress government is going to break Sree Ram Setu

Leave a Comment

Notice : The source URLs cited in the news/article might be only valid on the date the news/article was published. Most of them may become invalid from a day to a few months later. When a URL fails to work, you may go to the top level of the sources website and search for the news/article.

Disclaimer : The news/article published are collected from various sources and responsibility of news/article lies solely on the source itself. Hindu Janajagruti Samiti (HJS) or its website is not in anyway connected nor it is responsible for the news/article content presented here. ​Opinions expressed in this article are the authors personal opinions. Information, facts or opinions shared by the Author do not reflect the views of HJS and HJS is not responsible or liable for the same. The Author is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article. ​