Nehru distorted history by fabricating the truth on Timur Lang and Mohammad of Ghazni

Kartik Krushnapaksha Saptami, Kaliyug Varsha 5116

How could have Nehru, who narrated false history to his daughter through a letter, moulded future of children ?

On the occasion of birth anniversary of Nehru….

What are the ideals that Nehru has kept before children at thought and behavior levels ? Children’s Day is celebrated on the birth anniversary of Nehru. All Hindus should unitedly boycott such celebrations.

Jawaharlal Nehru was the first Prime Minister of India. There can be difference of opinions but facts always remain the same. This article will throw light on some of the aspects pertaining to Nehru. Jawaharlal Nehru wrote two books, titled ‘The Discovery of India (DoI)’ and ‘the Glimpses of World History (GWH)’. Besides history of India, he addressed various other subjects. This article is about his writings in these books. 

1. Taimur Lang reached with his Mongol army when there was nobody to oppose him; so he happily massacred people. In this massacre, both Hindus and Muslims were killed without any discrimination. He could not manage 100,000 prisoners; therefore, he ordered to kill them all.

Nehru writes to his daughter Indira Gandhi in his ‘GOI’ book about infiltrator Taimur Lang, ‘this cruel man was attracted by India’s prosperity. It was difficult for him to persuade his Army-Chiefs to agree for invasion of India as they were strongly against it due to hot Indian climate. Finally, Taimur gave his word that they would not stay in India; but just go, loot, destroy and come back’ and he kept his word.   
 
2.  ‘Malfuzat-i-Timuri’ is the auto-biography of Timur in which he writes that he invaded India for Islamic jihad which shows that Nehru tried to hide true history from his daughter
 
If what Nehru wrote is considered to be truth, people would feel that Taimur Lang invaded only with the purpose of looting and not for jihad. People may also feel that he was secular; but in his biography titled ‘Malfuzat-i-Timuri’, Taimur has written about invasion of Hindustan.  

He says, ‘I thought of invading the non-believers and become a ‘Ghazi’. (He knew that one who eradicates non-believers was known as victorious or champion/ defender and if he got killed, he was called a martyr) So, I made a resolve; but I was not able to decide whether to attack  non-believers in China or  non-believers and polytheists from India. I, therefore, searched for an omen in the Quran and found a line which said ‘O Prophet, wage a war against  non-believers s and punish them severely’. (Ref.: Quran, Ayat 9, verse 73)
 
The ‘Amirs’ of my army got disturbed with such word; but I told them, ‘I am going to attack Hindusthan against  non-believers and obey Prophet Mohammad’s order which would bestow grace and peace on us and our families. We shall sanctify that land by turning people to the true faith and free that land from non-believers and polytheists. We will destroy their temples and idols and become ‘Ghazis of God or Mujahedeen’.  
 
They reluctantly agreed; but I did not rely on them. I also sought opinion of Islamic thinkers. They said, “As Sultan of people, who believe that Allah is the God of Islam and only God and Mohammad is His Prophet, it becomes your duty to save your religion and try your best to eradicate faiths of your enemies. Also, it is the duty of every Muslim to obey the Sultan’s orders. With such enlightenment given by thinkers, the Army-Chiefs agreed to wage ‘jihad (holy war)’ against Hindustan and by going on their knees, started re-reciting the chapter of victory.
 
It clearly shows that the invasion was for Islamic jihad but this truth was not told by Nehru to his own daughter (Indira Gandhi).

3. Timur killing 100,000 Hindus imprisoned by him as he considered that releasing idol-worshippers and foes of Islam was breaking rules of war

Timur killed 100,000 people in one night. The chapter of the book begins with its title as ‘Killing of 100,000 Hindus’. It has been stated in the chapter that ‘In the Court, it was brought to my notice by Amir Jehan Shah and Amir Suleiman Shah so also other experienced amirs that since we entered Hindustan, 100, 000 Hindu non-believers were imprisoned and were detained in military camps. As they heard about victory of enemy, the prisoners were making signs of joy and cursing us on the previous day of attack. Before they could unite and free themselves, destroying our camps by joining hands with our enemy, I sought advice of my religious guides’.

On the day of that intense war, it was not proper to release 100, 000 prisoners. To release idol-worshipers and enemies of Islam would have been breaking rules of war. As such, there was no alternative but to kill them. On hearing this, as per the rules of war, I gave following instructions- Those, who have non-believers prisoners, should kill them and one, who does not obey the order, would also be killed. A person, who gives information about it, will be rewarded. As the ‘Ghazis’ came to know about it, they killed prisoners in their custody thus, 100, 000 inauspicious idol-worshipers were killed on that day. There was one maulana Nasiruddin Umar, who was a thinker and guide and had not killed even a sparrow in his whole life, killed 15 Hindu idol-worshipers to obey my orders. These idol-worshipers were sent to hell in a very inhuman manner.’
 
The above information shows that Nehru was telling lies to his daughter about secularism of Timur Lang. He was as fanatic as the jihadis.
 
4. Nehru wrote false history even in case of Ghazni Mohammad

Nehru not only gave false information about Timur Lang; but he tried to soften part of history involving cruel atrocities against our ancestors through every callous inhuman person; so as to make it acceptable through his writings.
 
In case of Ghazni Mohammad, he did the same thing. Mohammad was more of a warrior than a religious person. Like other victorious invaders, he too misused religion for achieving success. He had come here to only rob wealth and valuables from India.
 
4 A. Mohammad’s secretary Ulvi has written that Mohammad constantly attacked Hindus and took over city after city using force : Like Timur, Mohammad has not composed his biography but his secretary named Abu Nusra Mohammad Itra Mohammad Al Jabbarul Ulvi has described Mohammad’s jihadi activities, in high detail.
 
Ulvi has written, ‘He (Mohammad) constantly attacked Hindus for jihad. He drove away soldiers guarding forts even on very high mountains and looted wealth. He grabbed wealth of people from ‘Hind’; took control over cities. Till then, there were only non-believers (not believing in Islam) who were not trampled under Muslims’ camels and horses.
 
4B. Mohammad got attracted towards Mathura and buildings in Mathura (claims Nehru) : To cover up for such hideous face of Ghazni’s Mohammad, Nehru wrote in his book ‘DoI’, ‘he was attracted towards city of Mathura and buildings in that city. Like the people’s strong faith in Mathura, thousands of buildings in that city are also strong. By reading that re-construction of that city would take at least 200 years and several millions of dinars, one would feel that Mohammad was a connoisseur of ‘Vaastu-shastra’ or an admirer.
 
4C. In Ulvi’s opinion, Mohammad demolished huge temples in Mathura and destroyed them completely by setting them on fire with the help of oil extracted from tar, petrol etc. : At Mathura, Ulvi says about Mohammad’s jihad, (Date is written as ‘Tarikhe Yamini, PP 45, by Ulvi), there was a huge and strong temple in the centre of the city. It is impossible to describe these temples or even draw them. While paying respect to that, Sultan says, ‘If anyone wanted to build such buildings, he would have to spend thousands of ‘Lal Dinars’ and even if very skillful and experienced workers are engaged for construction, it would take about 200 years. Out of the idols, 5 idols were of 15 ft height, of gold and had no support from back side. In eyes of one idol, there were two most valuable ruby stones. Value of one ruby stone was 50,000 dinars. In the other idol, sapphire was used which was clearer than water and shining more than a crystal, with weight of 450 mescal. (1 mescal = 4.25 gm). The weight of feet of one idol was 4400 mescal. Weight of gold used in all these idols was 98300 mescal. There were 200 silver idols and it was not possible to weigh them in weighing scale unless they were cut to pieces. Sultan ordered to demolish all those temples and burn them with inflammable oil extracted from tar and petrol. The so-called connoisseur of ‘Vaastu’ destroyed that huge temple with the same motive with which Ajmal Kasab and his friends came to India.

5. Can a person, who can tell lies to own daughter, be trusted ?

Nehru used to approve overall pattern of history books and till today, so-called democratic and educational institutes like NCERT, ICHR and JNU have been committing sin of distortion of history. It is now time to frankly refer to a liar as a liar; irrespective of background of that person.
 
How will people respond to a lie told by a person holding responsible post ?

 
Can a person, who can so easily tell lies to own daughter, be trusted ? In a society where Sages like Patanjali were born, and they considered truth as the most righteous matter. Can people from such social background, pay respect to liars ?
 
– Shri. Neeraj Atri, (President, Vivekanand Karya Samiti), Panchkula, Haryana
 
[The writer is a President of National Historical Research and Comparative Studies Centre. He can be contacted on – [email protected]]

Source : Dainik Sanatan Prabhat