News Categories
Expand All | Collapse All

Subscribe to Daily Newsletter

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner
Kindly note verification mail goes to SPAM, so please check your SPAM folder too.

Supreme Court strikes down Centre's Haj policy

May 8, 2012
Vaishakh Krushna Trutiya, Kaliyug Varsha 5114

New Delhi :
  The Supreme Court today struck down the government's policy of giving subsidies to Haj pilgrims and directed that it be progressively "eliminated" within a period of 10 years.

"We hold that this policy is best done away with," a bench of justices Altamas Kabir and Ranjana Prakash Desai said.
The bench also directed the government to reduce to two the number of its representatives in the Prime Minister's goodwill delegation. Earlier, 30 people used to go with the delegation with the government bearing the cost.

The court also said that it will look into the functioning of Haj Committee of India and its process for selecting people for the pilgrimage.

The court was hearing an appeal filed by the Centre challenging a Bombay High Court judgement which had directed the Ministry of External Affairs to allow certain private operators to handle 800 of the 11,000 pilgrims earmarked under the VIP quota subsidised by the government.

The bench had expanded the purview of the plea and decided to look into the legality of the government's policy on granting subsidies to Haj pilgrims.

Several Muslim organisations have announced to back the Centre's proposed move to abolish the subsidy on Haj, provided more facilities are given to pilgrims. A senior member of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, Niyaz Farooqi, said that pilgrims do not get the benefits of the Haj subsidy provided by the Centre. "The subsidy in only beneficial to a particular airline, therefore its withdrawal will make no difference."

The government should shift focus on providing better accommodation and food facility to the pilgrims, he said adding, "Despite the subsidy, pilgrims have to pay extra for the trip."

During the hearing in the case, the Centre had defended the policy of giving subsidies to the Haj pilgrims and had said it had framed guidelines so that people get subsidies only once in their lifetime.

In an affidavit, the Centre had told the court that it has decided to restrict Haj pilgrimage at government subsidy to Muslims only as a "once in a lifetime" affair as against the existing policy of "once in five years".

It had said the new guidelines have been framed to ensure that priority is given to those applicants who have never performed Haj.

The government, however, had refrained from disclosing the amount of subsidy being incurred by it for 2012, saying, "The exact figure in respect of the travel subsidy to the pilgrims going through Haj Committee of India for 2012 will be known after the Hajis completed their Haj journey and return to India."

Source : NDTV

Follow HJS on Social Media

Related Articles

» The biggest holocaust in World History, whitewashed from history
» Abu Azmi sentenced to 2-year jail term for inciting communal violence
» Egypt to bring in law allowing man to have sex with dead wife
» Woman killed for refusing sex with Muslim father-in-law
» UP : Muslims demand closure of US, Israel embassies in India but not Pakistan

Notice: The source URLs cited in the article might be only valid on the date the article was published. Most of them may become invalid from a day to a few months later. When a URL fails to work, you may go to the top level of the source's website and search for the article.

Disclaimer: The news published are collected from various sources and responsibility of news lies solely on the source itself. Hindu Janajagruti Samiti or its website is not in anyway connected nor is it responsible for the news content presented here.

Rate this Article :










Poor Excellent
comment Post comment | Print Article Print Article | Send to friends Send to friends | Save as PDF Save as PDF

Comments (1)

mgd, India (Bharat)
08 May 2012, 16:16
I think this is only an opinion expressed by the S.C. and Hindus should not naively believe that it will actually happen. Moreover, even if it happens, the amount reserved for it will be spent on Muslims only which may be worse.
* Comments posting may be delayed due to moderation.
* Please refrain from using abusive and violent language.
* Be brief and to the point. Avoid ALL CAPS.
* URLs and Email ids are not allowed in comments.
*Name:   Remember me?: 
*Email:   Erase Details 
You may enter 700 characters